Thomas Nast’s February 8, 1879 cartoon entitled “Every Dog (no distinction of color) Has His Day” published in Harper’s Weekly, depicts discrimination of Chinese immigrants. In the cartoon, a Chinese immigrant reads signs posted on the wall with anti-Chinese statements. A Native American looks over the Chinese man’s shoulder and there is a caption, “Pale face ‘fraid you crowd him out as he did me”. An African American man reclines in the corner of the cartoon with a smiling face, the words “My day is coming” written on the wall beside him. This cartoon was drawn during a depression that began in the mid 1870’s.1 America focused on minority groups and Chinese immigrants specifically, as a group that would snatch American jobs from Americans. Finding a scapegoat in the Chinese immigrants, California went so far as to pass a law banning the employment of Chinese workers and forcing their relocation outside city limits. Eventually, the U.S. circuit court would rule that law unconstitutional, but this does explain the extent of fear and blame attributed to the Chinese immigrant.2 Thomas Nast’s dislike for the Irish can also be found in this cartoon. The anti-Chinese postings on the wall are signed by “Kearney (a real American)” and “Pat. Irish. Esq.”. Stating “foreigners not wanted” expresses the hypocritical tone of the cartoon, since all Americas came from an immigrant past and the Irish suffered, along with other groups, under discrimination and hatred. The Ku Klux Klan is also represented in the cartoon, by a small posting on the wall, almost being covered up by the anti-Chinese posting, representing an emphasis on Chinese immigration eclipsing the anti-African American stance. Groups that were once divided in America banned together in joint racism against the Native Americans, Chinese and African Americans, conveniently forgetting their own struggles against bigotry. Henry George, an American writer during the late nineteenth century, offered the explanation, “the population of this country has been drawn from many different sources; but hitherto, with but one exception these accessions have been of the same race, and though widely differing in language, customs, and national characteristics, have been capable of being welded into a homogenous people.”3 This cartoon seems to represent the idea that white men could argue and disagree about most politics but could unite in discrimination, despite the obvious hypocrisy. The Native American and the African Americans’ presence in the cartoon serve to point to other races that were targeted by white Americans and immigrants alike. Like passing the torch to the next group for persecution, the Native American is encouraging the Chinese man’s ire. The African American appears to be relieved that the spotlight is not on him anymore and in a prophecy even Nast could not have foreseen, states that his day will come, which would occur in the Civil rights movement of the 1960’s. This cartoon stands as a lasting reminder that issues like immigration, racism, discrimination and who qualifies as a ‘real’ American are not new issues, and remain in American society today.
1Lucy Salyer. Laws Harsh as Tigers. (North Carolina, The University of North Carolina Press) 1995, 9.
2Lisa Sanderson. March 16, 2009. “The Financial Crisis of the 1870’s The Long Depression”. www.suite101.com, retrieved February 11, 2012, [from] http://lisa-sanderson.suite101.com/the-financial-crisis-of-the-1870s-a102773.
3Philip S. Foner and Daniel Rosenberg, ed. Racism, Dissent, and Asian Americans from 1850 to Present. (Westport Connecticut, Greenwood Press 1993), 86.
I think you brought out the main point of the cartoon, hypocrisy. The Americans wanted cheap labor from the Chinese, making railroads, etc, but they did not want them having the same wages or even live next to them. It's seems every culture was discriminated against and Nast depicts the Native Americans and African Americans in this cartoon as well, meaning discrimination happened before, it will happen again. Good post!
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your post. The way that you described every detail from the cartoon informed me on things I didn't see at a glance. I also liked the way that you brought everything that the cartoon discusses into today's world. Great post.
ReplyDeleteHi Amy! I really loved how you mentioned that white men were torn on so many issues but could always be united when it came to discrimination. What a sad but true point. I guess, in a way, the feeling towards immigrants in the United States back in the 19th century is quite similar to the feelings many of us have now towards immigrants from Mexico, both legal and illegal. Like the Chinese immigrants, Americans now complain that immigrants take jobs from American. The problem is though, once again, like the Chinese, many of these jobs are menial positions most Americans refuse to work in the first place. It's unfortunate that discrimination is still a strong factor in our modern day society.
ReplyDeleteHi Amy,
ReplyDeleteI think you really captured Nast's feeling of irony with your statement, "since all Americas came from an immigrant past and the Irish suffered, along with other groups, under discrimination and hatred."
I'm not sure the Native American is expressing relief as one of the posters shows the whole Manifest Destiny idea, it shows Americans going further west, pushing the Native American's onto small reservations.
I agree with you that for now, the African' Americans are in the background, so to speak, he's physically in the background looking unworried in the cartoon, as the focus is on the "Chinese Problem." His time will come, could refer to the civil rights movement, as you said, or it could refer to further persecution and blame African Americans will experience once the focus comes back on them.
As always, great post! I enjoyed reading your interpretation of Nast's cartoon.
Jaime
Hi Amy. I enjoyed reading your post about Thomas Nast’s cartoon “Every Dog (no distinction of color) Has His Day”. I chose this cartoon as well. (On a side note, I like that you mention how Nast’s own dislike for the Irish can be found in the cartoon. Nast’s dislike for Irish immigrants also can be seen in some of his other political cartoons, such as his famous “The American River Ganges” from 1871.) As you say, “This cartoon seems to represent the idea that white men could argue and disagree about most politics but could unite in discrimination, despite the obvious hypocrisy.” I agree. Ironically, nativism has seemed to unite various Americans over the years. First, Americans targeted Native Americans, even though the land was theirs. Next, targets included African Americans, most of whom were brought over in slavery and thus seen as “less” than Americans (they were counted as 3/5 of a person until after the Civil War). (1) Then, as you discuss, various groups of immigrants, such as the Irish and Chinese, were targeted, sometimes through unfair legislation such as the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, which prohibited all Chinese laborers from entering the country. (2) All in all, your post did a great job summarizing the ideology behind Nast’s cartoon.
ReplyDeleteFootnotes:
1) Steven Kelman and others, eds., American Government (Austin, Texas: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 2003), 39.
2) Andrew Cayton and others, eds., America: Pathways to the Present (Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2000), 470.